Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5548 (AP)

Pamuru Raghava Reddy, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/2688/2025 · 2025-04-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010048252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2688/2025 Between: 1. PAMURU RAGHAVA REDDY,, S/O. PAMURU GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-206KODURUPADUMAIN ROAD, NELLORE, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-524314 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATION OF RURAL POVERTY, REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 2ND FLOOR, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DRDA) NELLORE, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. NELLORE MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, NELLORE URBAN, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE WELFARE ASSISTANT, GRAMA SACHIVALAVAM, 1ST DIVISION, KODURUPADU, HARIJANAWADA, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJANI NELAKUDITI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Heard Smt Rajani Nelakuditi, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that eight months of pension which was pending has already been paid by the Official Respondents and therefore no further consideration is necessary. 3. Having regard to the statement made by Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, no further consideration is necessary in this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dated: 04.04.2025 M K K HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No: 2688 of 2025 Dated: 04.04.2025 M K K 85