Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55473 (AP)

VALETI MADHAVI v. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS

CC/4267/2024 · 2025-11-27

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010493452024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4267/2024 Between: 1. VALETI MADHAVI, , W/O. MADHUSUDANA RAO, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5-131, N.G.O.COLONY ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, A.S PRINCIPAI SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THAMEEM ANSARIA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. CHEETHALA SRINIVASA RAO, THE JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR, DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. RAMISETTY SRI LATHA, , THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER/DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. ABDUL KHADIR LODGI, CEO, WAKF BOARD, 4TH FLOOR, IMDADGHAR BUILDING, KALESWARA RAO MARKET, TARAPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 520003. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to hold the respondent accountable for the violation of the orders dated 02.05.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 975 of 2024, and to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K.P.S. SAILESH REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V SRINIVASULA REDDY 2. J DILEEP KUMAR 3. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 02.05.2024 passed in W.P.No.975 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri T. Rama Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K.P.S. Sailesh Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 02.05.2024 passed in W.P.No.975 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 390 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.4267 OF 2024 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN