RAVINDER SINGH KADAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/33526/2021 · 2025-09-24
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55464 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55464 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
266 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33526-2021 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 Ravinder Singh Kadan
.....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. S.S. Narula, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. K.S. Nalwa, Advocate Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ashima Attri, Advocate and Mr. Vismaad S. Bajwa, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY
, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial is at the fag end, as the matter is now listed for defence evidence, in view of which,
learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to take all pleas at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law and if need be to file an appropriate application for seeking exemption on ground of he being aged alongwith with medical record.
2. Ordered accordingly. In case an exemption application is filed, the same shall be decided sympathetically in accordance with law.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 24.09.2025 neeraj Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NEERAJ 2025.09.26 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document