Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79978 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naresh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Artee Gupta,Ravindra Kumar Pandey,Yogesh Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Singhal Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for the respodnents as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the notification issued by the Chairman qua selection against the post under the Combined Technical Services Physical Efficiency Test in which no norms for Physical Standard Test were laid down and hence, holding of physical efficiency test after a period of nine years was not justified. 3. Sri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the controversy involved in this petition is already engaging attention of this Court in Writ A No.4700 of 2025 wherein vide paragraph no.11 of the order dated 15.04.2025, the Court has observed thus: "11. In so far as the second argument is concerned that the norms that have been prescribed were not prescribed earlier in the advertisement, suffice it to observe that once the Rules prescribe for norms, whether it is contained in the advertisement or not, it hardly matters. Every recruitment exercise is to be undertaken as per Rules prescribed for such recruitment drive and even if the advertisement is silent the service rules would prevail. " 4. In view of the above, the petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad