IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CWP-12909-2025 Date of Decision: 20.08.2025 Kartar Singh Chambial ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents 125 CWP-12950-2025 No.14215734 Y Ex-Hav Kuldip Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents 129 CWP-13272-2025 Rajesh No.1521870X Ex-GNR ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents 130 CWP-13298-2025 Baljit Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.15 11:25 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-12909-2025 CWP-12950-2025 CWP-13272-2025 and CWP-13298-2025 -: 2 :- Present: Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners in all the petitions. Ms. Bhavana Datta, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondent – UOI. **** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. By these petitions, the prayer of the petitioners is to give appropriate directions to the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal), to decide the execution applications filed by the petitioners so as to execute the orders passed by the Tribunal extending certain benefits in favour of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent- authorities did not implement the impugned orders within the stipulated time period of three months, as had been directed by the Tribunal, therefore, the execution applications was filed by the petitioners, direction to dispose of which applications is being sought by the petitioners. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On asking of this Court, Ms. Bhavana Datta, Senior Panel Counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent – Union of India. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent has not been able to dispute with regard to the aforesaid factual position. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance. 7. Considering the nature of relief being sought in the writ petitions VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.15 11:25 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-12909-2025 CWP-12950-2025 CWP-13272-2025 and CWP-13298-2025 -: 3 :- and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the cases, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Tribunal to take necessary steps to dispose of the execution applications filed by the petitioner(s) by passing a final order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt or production of certified copy of this order. 8. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 9. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) August 20, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.15 11:25 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC