1 2025:CGHC:4402 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 696 of 2025 • Yogendra Kumar Nayak S/o Kanhaiya Lal Nayak Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 106/1, Ward No. 7, Bhagat Devari, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. Managing Director, Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Union Maryadit, Forest Division, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 4. Deputy Director, Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Union Maryadit, Forest Division, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 5. Ravi Lal Bhoi S/o Shyamsundar Bhoi, R/o Village Ratadadar, Bhagat Devari, Police Station Sankara, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 6. Suman Prakash Sahu S/o Girdhari Sahu R/o Village Dhabakhar, Post Bhagat Devari, Police Station Sankara, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/01/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to produce all the relevant records relating to case of the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the undated merit list (Annexure P-1) and further all the consequential proceeding in furtherance of Annexure P-1. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to put the name of petitioner in first place of merit list and give him appointment letter. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on telephonic instructions he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this 3 writ petition with liberty to file a better petition as some appointment order has been passed. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat