Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55458 (AP)

G RAMA CHANDRA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13899/2023 · 2025-12-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010269272023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13899/2023 Between: 1. G RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/O. LATE TIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS AND CULTIVATION, R/O.CROSS ROAD, BORN MALAHGARIPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. PRESENT R/O. HS NO. 404, C-BLOCK, ASHREYA APARTMENTS, LBS ROAD, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (LAND ACQUISITION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERALDG, ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU A.P., 2ND FIORE, N.T.R. ADMIN. BLOCK, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NHAI, PIU-TIRUPATHI, 0/0. D.NO.1-5- 564/C, BALAJI COLONY, OPP. LAKSHMI NARAYANAKALYANAMANDAPAM, TIRUPATHI, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE JOINT COLLECTORII AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY L A, PILER TO CHERLOPALLI SECTION, NH-71, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. Page 2 of 5 6. THE TAHSILDAR, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. P SRINIVASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. THE JOINT COLLECTOR-11 AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY (L.A), PILER TO CHERLOPALLI SECTION, NH-71, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. LAKSHMI NARASAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. IN-CHARGE DEPUTY COLLECTOR FOR PROJECT NHAI, PIU-TIRUPATHI, 0/O. D.NO. 1-5-564/C, BALAJI COLONY, OPP. LAKSHMI NARAYANAKALYANAMANDAPAM, TIRUPATHI, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. AMARNADH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. IN-CHARGE TAHSILDAR TO ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 10. SHAIK KAREEMULLA, S/O.SHAIK ABDUL GAFFARSAHEB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SANTHA BAZAAR VEEDHI, ROMPICHERLA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. SHAIKH MOHAMMAD GHOUSE, S/O. SHAIKH ABDUL GAFFARSAHEEB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SANTHA BAZAAR VEEDHI, ROMPICHERLA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 12. SHAIKH KHADAR BASHA, S/O.SHAIK ABDUL GAFFARSAHEB, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O SANTHA BAZAAR VEEDHI, ROMPICHERLA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the highhanded action of the Respondents No. 5 to 9 releasing the land acquisition award amount without considering my objections representations dated 15.06.2018, 19.05.2023 and 30.05.2023 by taking bribe Rs.10 lakh from the Respondent no 10 to 12 whose land entered in the disputed register/prohibited land record in respect of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.3.30 Cents in Sy.No.879/1, and Ac 1.0 cents in Sy.No.879/5 of Bommaiahgaripalli Revenue Village, Rompicherla Mandal, Chittoor District which is illegal, irrational and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 1 to conduct inquiry through the 2nd Respondent for disbursed land acquisition award Rs.30,00,000/- instead of Rs.18,86,525/- without considering my objections and without following the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and not following due process of law, and devolved interest of respondents nos. 5 to 9 for tampering the revenue records by remove prohibited land list in disputed land records without obeying court orders in I.A.No.132 of 2016 in O.S.No.15 of 2016, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 to consider the Petitioner representation dated 15.06.2018, 19.05.2023 and 30.05.2023, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SARASWATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S M SUBHANI (SC FOR ACB AND SPL PP) 2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13899 of 2023 ORDER:- Learned counsel for petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.12.2025 TVN 46 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13899 OF 2023 Date: 04.12.2025 TVN