Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55453 (KAR)

SMT. BHAGYAMMA V v. THE MANAGER

MFA/10411/2013 · 2025-09-08

P Sree Sudha

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35310 MFA No. 10411 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 10411/2013 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA V W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.67, 7TH CROSS AZAD NAGAR, NEAR T.R.MILL CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560018 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SATHISH B., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., D.O.3, NO.15-17, I FLOOR LAKSHMI COMPLEX ST. MARKS ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. SRI G.ASHOK NO.86, 2ND EAST MAIN ROAD III COLONY. BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BANGALORE - -560 078 3. SRI D.R.PARAMESH S/O D.B.RANGASWAMY R/O DODDAKAREDEVUR KUNDUR POST, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35310 MFA No. 10411 of 2013 DONDIGANAHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 572 101 4. RAJAN A PILLAI S/O ANAND DAS PILLAI R/O NO.1058, 9TH CROSS RAMAIAH LAYOUT ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BANGALORE-560084 5. M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED NO.3, 1ST FLOOR, NORTH WING ROAD, MAHANADI PLAZA ST. MARKS ROAD BANGALORE-560001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.S.LINGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI B.PRADDEP, ADVOCATE FOR R5 NOTICE TO R2-4 DISPENSED WITH V/O/DT:30.09.2025) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.07.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.1129/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35310 MFA No. 10411 of 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is present and submits that against the order passed in MVC No.1129/2011 dated 31.07.2013, previously another appeal was filed in MFA No.481/2014 and the same was settled in the Lok-Adalat on 08.04.2017. 3. Prior to the aforesaid order, this appeal is filed. As the appeal i.e., MFA No.481/2014 filed against the order passed in MVC No.1129/2011, was already settled before the Lok-Adalat, this appeal does not survive for consideration. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18