Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55452 (AP)

Karella Ganapathi Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17864/2021 · 2025-09-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010300512021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17864/2021 Between: 1. KARELLA GANAPATHI RAO, S/O LAKSHMANA SWAMY, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1-71-13/1, KANKIPATIVARIGARUVU, NEAR SRNIVASATHEATER, 7TH WARD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KARELIA RAJESH, S/O GANAPATHI RAO, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1-71-13/1, KANKIPATIVARIGARUVU, NEAR SRNIVASATHEATER, 7TH WARD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TUNI TOWN POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. YALLAPUKASULAMMA, W/O LAKSHMANA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O KANKIPATIVARIGARUVU, NEAR SRNIVASATHEATER, 7TH WARD, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Y KOTESWARA RAO 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17864 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the registration of the said FIR in crime No. 150 of 2020 under sections 384, 354, 420 r/w 34 of IPC as illegal, void, unconstitutional and violative of the Articles 14, 17, 19(1)(3), 20, 20(1), 21 of the Constitution of India and opposed to the principles of fair play and consequently declare the said FIR No.150 of 2019, of Tuni Town Police Station as illegal and unconstitutional and set aside the same and further prayed to grant stay of all further proceedings in the said FIR including the arrest of the petitioners, herein pending disposal of the writ petition..…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17864 of 2021 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 643