Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55451 (AP)

PALAKURTHI HARINATH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/30646/2025 · 2025-11-06

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010579182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30646/2025 Between: 1. PALAKURTHI HARINATH, S/O. (LATE) PALAKURTHI SHANKARA RAO, GRANDSON OF PALAKURTHI APPA RAO, AGE 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.16-20, KAPU VEEDHI, SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 3. THE JOINT COLLECTORCUMREVISIONAL AUTHORITY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. PALAKURTHI APPARAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.10-40-2, OPP CITY VIEW APARTMENT, NEAR INDUS IND BANK, RAMNAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT -530002. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the action of the respondents No. 2 to 5 to place the land in Sy.No. 501/9 (old Sy.Nos. 823/1 and 824) of Srungavarapukota Village in the Dispute Register in accordance with the CCLA Circular dated 19.03.2024 pending final adjudication of the Revision Petition dated 21.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India direct the respondents (District Collector and Joint Collector, Vizianagaram) to forthwith mark the subject land as Disputed Property in all relevant registers including Webland, prohibiting any registration, mutation, or alienation, pending disposal of the Revision Petition dt.21.10.2025 before the 3rd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 to mark the subject land in Sy.No.501/9 (Old Sy.Nos.823/1 and 824) as “Disputed in the Webland and Registration Database, thereby restraining any further registration or mutation until the revision petition is disposed of, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. K.V.S.S.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30646 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following relief:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to place the land in Sy.No.501/9 of Srungavarapukota village in the “Dispute Register” in accordance with the CCLA Circular dated 19.03.2024 pending final adjudication of the revision petition dated 21.10.2025 as illegal”. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while pending Writ Petition, the respondent authorities have acted upon the directions of the appellate authority and hence nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:07.11.2025 SJ 4 118 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30646 of 2025 07.11.2025 ssjj