CRM-M-27131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 MANPREET SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to respondent No. 2. petitioner has P-4) before the present petition by issuing the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 27131-2025 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MANPREET SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Ms. Dheerja, Advocate for Mr. P.P.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and respondent No.4 on the complaint, moved by the petitioner. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r has filed the representation dated ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for the present petition by issuing directions to the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27131-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 23.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner 3 to take legal action against the on the complaint, moved by the petitioner. sel representing the petitioner submits that the representation dated 01.01.2025 (Annexure earned counsel prays for disposing of irections to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. respondents No.1 to 3 only. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for action against the sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure disposing of to decide GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.24 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-27131 5. present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is requisite safety and security to protect however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Muktsar Sahib threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 27131-2025 (O&M) 8587 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioner shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect his however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Muktsar Sahib shall be at liberty to make an independent asses threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to him. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of further directed that the petitioner shall be provided his life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of :Yes/No Yes/No and circumstances, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 4) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of further directed that the petitioner shall be provided life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District sment of the threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.24 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document