APHC010373342019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3665/2019 Between: 1. CHILAKALA MALYADRI, S/O MALAKONDAIAH, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. CHILAKALA MALLIKARJUNA, S/O MALAKONDAIAH R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT 3. ANIKEPALLI LAKSHAMMA, W/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. VENNAPUSA KONDA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT 2. VENNAPUSA SRIRAMULU REDDY, S/O NARAPA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT 3. VENNAPUSA MOHANA REDDY, S/O NARAPA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT 4. PULICHERLA SUBHASHINI, W/O RAMANAIAH, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT 5. VENNAPUSA CHINAKONDA REDDY, S/O KOTA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. VENNAPUSA CHECHI REDDY, S/O KOTA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. CHILAKALA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O KONDA REDDY, R/O NANDIGUNTA VILLAGE, VINJAMUR MANDAL, 2 HN, J C.R.P.No.3665 of 2019 S.P.S NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tothe order of the Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, in LA No. 295/2011 in O.S.No. 95/2010 dated 31.07.2019 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Ex-parte decree dated 24.02.2011 in O.s. No. 95/2010. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PAVULURI SREENIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MARELLA RADHA The Court made the following: 3 HN, J C.R.P.No.3665 of 2019 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioners today. 2. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by the order dated 31.07.2019, whereby the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kavali, dismissed the application filed under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioners have no connection whatsoever with the suit schedule property, and that respondent Nos.1 to 7 have already partitioned the family property. As such, there are no further issues requiring adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition. 4. Recording the above submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 15th October, 2025 cbn 4 HN, J C.R.P.No.3665 of 2019 104 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3665 of 2019 15th October, 2025 cbn