APHC010496802017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12101/2017 Between: 1. P PAVAN KUMAR, S/O. P. KRISHNAIAH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC: DATA ENTRY OPERATOR, O/O AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, PULIVENDULA, R/O. D.NO.4-1-197, ANKALAMMAPETA, PULIVENDULA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF TG PRL SCY AGRL GUNTUR DIST 5, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE, KADAPA. 4. AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PULIVENDULA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE CHAIRMAN, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE, PULIVENDULA. 6. BHARATH MANPOWER SERVICES, REP. BY MANAGING PARTNER, NGO COLONY, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or declaring the inaction of the respondents 4 and 5 in allowing the petitioner to 2 discharge duties as Data Entry Operator in the Agricultural Marketing Committee, Pulivendula, Kadapa District without assigning any reasons, without following any procedure as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Data Entry Operator Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) 3. (SC FOR A M C) The court made the following ORDER: When the matter is called, Sri G. Rajeswar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.11.2025 GVK 3 354 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.12101 of 2017 Date: 28.11.2025 GVK