DUSHHYANT SINGH ALIAS DUSHIANT ALIAS DUSHYANT v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/4760/2025 · 2025-05-12
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55423 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55423 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-4760-2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Dushhyant Singh @ Dushiant @ Dushyant
State of Punjab
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA
Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL
At the outset, learned counsel f restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally dispose of the petitioner’s application dated before the jail authorities, of parole as the same has been pending decision for the last more than months. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is a spirit behind Section 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962. 4. In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the petitioner’s application dated 2025 (O&M) Sr. No.103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-4760 Date of Decision :
Dushhyant Singh @ Dushiant @ Dushyant
Versus and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. K.S.Sidhu, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G.,
*** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally dispose of the petitioner’s application dated before the jail authorities, District Jail, Sri Muktsar Sahib of parole as the same has been pending decision for the last more than Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of nate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is a spirit behind Section 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962.
In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the petitioner’s application dated 10.12.2024 filed by him for the grant of parole within two p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
4760-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.05.2025
…Petitioner
…Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab. or the petitioner submits that he prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally dispose of the petitioner’s application dated 10.12.2024 presented Sri Muktsar Sahib, Punjab for grant of parole as the same has been pending decision for the last more than five Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of nate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the petitioner’s filed by him for the grant of parole within two VANDANA 2025.05.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-4760-2025 (O&M)
weeks from the date of receipt of a law. 5. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. May 12, 2025 Vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable :
2025 (O&M) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL
JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No p. 2 copy of this order, in accordance with All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2025.05.13 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document