Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55420 (CHH)

SAURABH EKKA v. SMT. VIBHA PATHAK

MAC/389/2023 · 2025-12-08

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:59760 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 389 of 2023 1 - Saurabh Ekka S/o Shri Telesphore Ekka Aged About 20 Years R/o Nawapara, Indira Nagar, Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) .......... (Driver) ... Appellant Versus 1 - Smt. Vibha Pathak W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Pathak, Aged About 52 Years R/o Kacheripara, Ward No. 5, Bemetara, Tehsil And District - Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Ashok Kumar Pathak, S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan Pathak, Aged About 55 Years R/o Kacheripara, Ward No. 5, Bemetara, Tehsil And District - Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Ku. Aditi Pathak, D/o Ashok Kumar Pathak, Aged About 22 Years R/o Kacheripara, Ward No. 5, Bemetara, Tehsil And District - Bemetara (C.G.) ................ Claimants 4 - Abhishek Yadav, S/o Vinod Kumar Yadav, Aged About 26 Years R/o Bramhpuri, Budha Talab, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) __________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : None. For Respondent No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate SAURABH YADAV Digitally signed by SAURABH YADAV Date: 2025.12.09 16:37:31 +0530 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 09.12.2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called twice for hearing. However, Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (claimants), submits that the appellant–driver and the claimants have entered into a compromise and the dispute has been resolved. 2. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Saurabh