Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55418 (CHH)

SMT. NIRMALA NAGARCHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13505/2025 · 2025-12-02

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:58642 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13505 of 2025 • Smt. Nirmala Nagarchi W/o Shri Chandrakant Nagarchi Aged About 43 Years R/o Near Satyanarayan Mandir, Gobra Nawapara, Block Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Divisional Commissioner Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 5. District Education Officer Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 03.12.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in the same manner and on the same parameters as applied in the cases of other similarly situated teachers. MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.12.05 11:06:07 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already joined the transferred place, but her representation is still pending before the respondent authority. 3. Since the petitioner has already joined the transferred place, but her representation is still pending, the respondent authorities are directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law. 4. With aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish