Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55413 (AP)

MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS v. PRADYUMNA IAS

CC/5416/2023 · 2025-09-24

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010502992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5416/2023 Between: 1. MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER B TRIVIKRAM S/O BRK MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D NO 5414/19/5 BHARATHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRADYUMNA IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ROADS AND BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R1) 2. C SANJEEVA RAYUDU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B N H DIVISION VIJAYAWADA. (R3) 3. SS RAWATH IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.(R4) 4. PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20 06 2025 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2024 IN C C NO 5416 OF 2023 ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 12.05.2023 passed in W.P. No. 12368 of 2023 by the Lordships-SRI-JUSTICE V. SUJATHA and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to Implead the Proposed Respondent No.4 as party/respondent in the above C.C.No. 5416 OF 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3. ASHOK RAM V 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.12368 of 2023 on 12.05.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release total amount of Rs.30,32,028/- to the petitioner within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the petitioner to agitate his claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Sri Nagula Nagaraju, learned counsel representing 4th respondent has furnished a letter addressed by the 1st respondent vide Letter No.CC.5416/2023, dated 25.09.2025, which disclosed that net amount of Rs.32,99,324/- has been deposited to the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.RBISN62025092522557323 and the orders of the Court has been complied with. Therefore, prays to close the contempt case, the said fact was also not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:25.09.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5416/2023 Date:25.09.2025 KA