APHC010146622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 819/2025 Between: 1. R.LAKSHMAN RAO,, S/O. R.SOMLA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DOWLAISWARAM, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (NOW REDESIGNATED AS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH), WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI T V N A R KUMAR, ENGINEER IN CHIEF, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them for wilfull and intentional and violation of the orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P.No.4804 of 2025 dt.25.02.2025 under sec.10 and 12 of contempt of courts act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SRINIVASA BABA p. 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.4804 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri K. Devendra, learned counsel representing Sri C. Srinivasa Baba, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that in pursuance of the order dated 25.02.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.4804 of 2025, a speaking order has been passed by the authority considering the representation made by the petitioner and the same was communicated to the petitioner. 3. Since a speaking order was passed by the authority, this Court does not fine any violation of the order dated 25.02.2025, passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.4804 of 2025, and the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. 4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN p. 3 106 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.819 OF 2025 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN