Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5541 (JHR)

MANOJ KUMAR SAW ALIAS MANOJ VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1596/2025 · 2025-03-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1596 of 2025 ------ Manoj Kumar Saw @ Manoj Verma, aged about 37 years, son of Radhanath Saw, resident of Vill-Parbatpur, Near Bal Krishna Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Shikaripara, Dist.-Dumka … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 11.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Shikaripara P.S. Case No.98 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2)/190/115(2)/117(2)/109 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant and his family members. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature. It is then submitted that from the side of the petitioner, Shikaripara P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024 has been instituted and there was free fight between the parties and the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Dumka, in connection with Shikaripara P.S. Case No.98 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-