APHC010535402023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 28092/2023 Between: 1. BOGGALA SUDHAKAR, S/O VEERAPPA, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O GANGA DODDI, H/O KURAPARTHI VILLAGE, OBULAMPALLE POST, VALMIKIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VALMIKIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. VALMIKIPURAM GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VALMIKIPURAM VILLAGE, VALMIKIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order Or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly the action of the respondent No.4 in orally directing the petitioner not to make construction in the property bearing Plot No.2 in an extent of 69.44 Square Yards situated in Sy.No.1287 of Valmikipuram Village and Mandal, Chittoor District belong to the petitioner without following due process of law even though the petitioner got valid permission from the 4th respondent office for construction of house in the said Plot as bad illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner and construction work raising in the above said in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and/or in construction works in his house property bearing Plot No.2 in an extent of 69.44 Square Yards situated in Sy.No.1287 of Valmikipuram Village and Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T Nagaraja Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri D.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri T.Naga Raja, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th December, 2025 RKS