122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25717-2025 DECIDED ON: 12.05.2025 JAI AGGARWAL .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Harita Panthey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 read with Section 529 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for entrustment of investigation in case FIR No. 124 dated 11.09.2024 (ANNEXURE P-1) under Sections 304, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Sirhind, District Fatehgarh Sahib to an independent agency or a Special Investigation Team comprised of Senior Police Officials. preferably and officer of IPS Rank, outside District Fatehgarh Sahib, in view of the grave and flagrant violation of law of land, especially in view of the Anuradha 2025.05.13 06:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25717-2025 2 peculiar fact that the local Police is shielding the real perpetrators as it is evident from the peculiar facts that even after identifying the co-accused Manpreet Singh @ Manna who is the son of an ASI officer, no action has been taken by the police to nab the accused or initiate any inquiry against the said accused. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in Memo of Parties, inadvertently, respondent No. 3 is typed as Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, District Sangrur instead of Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib. He submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib to decide the representation dated 15.04.2025 (Annexure P- 3) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 15.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 12.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.13 06:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document