IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 142 JAI BHAGWAN STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAG, Haryana. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the paid a total sum of Rs. allotted as the scheme itself was scrapped. He further submits that deposited by the petitioner ought to be refunded along with interest. He submits that this Court in the case of Haryana and another decided on 30.05.2022, had d with mean savings bank interest Heard. We are of the considered view that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Gahlaut Vs. Housing Boa petition stands allowed the mean savings bank interest within a period of two months 24.07.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13191-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 24.07.2025 JAI BHAGWAN Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAG, Haryana. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the total sum of Rs.2,36,000/- for allotment of plot but the plot d as the scheme itself was scrapped. He further submits that deposited by the petitioner ought to be refunded along with interest. He submits that this Court in the case of Raj Pal Singh Gahlaut Vs. Housing Board Haryana and another and other connected cases, decided on 30.05.2022, had directed the respondents to with mean savings bank interest to the petitioners Heard. We are of the considered view that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Gahlaut Vs. Housing Board Haryana and another allowed in the same terms. The amount mean savings bank interest within a period of two months (ANUPINDER SINGH (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 24.07.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had for allotment of plot but the plot could not be d as the scheme itself was scrapped. He further submits that the money deposited by the petitioner ought to be refunded along with interest. He submits Raj Pal Singh Gahlaut Vs. Housing Board and other connected cases, CWP No.19124 of 2021, respondents to refund the amount along to the petitioners. We are of the considered view that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Raj Pal Singh another (supra). Therefore, the in the same terms. The amount be refunded along with mean savings bank interest within a period of two months to the petitioner. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No had be money deposited by the petitioner ought to be refunded along with interest. He submits Raj Pal Singh Gahlaut Vs. Housing Board , amount along We are of the considered view that the case of the petitioner is Raj Pal Singh (supra). Therefore, the be refunded along with SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.25 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document