SATYAWAN DECEASED THR HIS LRS AND OTHERS v. DR G ANUPAMA IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/886/2025 · 2026-01-19
Alka Sarin
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 554 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 554 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
186
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SATYAWAN DECEASED THR HIS LRS AND OTHERS
DR G ANUPAMA IAS AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Jasbir Mor,
Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Balyan,
Mr. Piyush Khanna, HARKESH MANUJA
Learned Sharma, D.D.A., SJE Department, H.R. submits that grant been received and the arrears of salary in f be released within
In view of the above, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 17.03.2025 Tejwinder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
SATYAWAN DECEASED THR HIS LRS AND OTHERS
Versus DR G ANUPAMA IAS AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for Mr. Piyush Khanna, Advocate for **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Rohit Sharma, D.D.A., SJE Department, H.R. submits that grant been received and the arrears of salary in f be released within a period of 4 weeks from today. In view of the above, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the forementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-886-2025 Date of Decision: March 17, 2025
SATYAWAN DECEASED THR HIS LRS AND OTHERS.......Petitioners
........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. Advocate for respondent No.3. Advocate for respondent No.4. on instructions from Mr. Rohit Sharma, D.D.A., SJE Department, H.R. submits that grant-in-aid has been received and the arrears of salary in favour of the petitioners shall 4 weeks from today.
In view of the above, no cause survives in the present
in case the needful is not done within the forementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 March 17, 2025
on instructions from Mr. Rohit aid has avour of the petitioners shall In view of the above, no cause survives in the present in case the needful is not done within the forementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.18 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document