Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55394 (CHH)

Panna Lal Pujari v. Smt. Janaki Bharat (Deleted)

SA/565/2016 · 2025-08-21

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42647 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 565 of 2016 1. Panna Lal Pujari S/o Late Jagnnath Pujari, Aged About 65 Years R/o Chhoti Shitla Mandir Parisar, Near Kali Badi Chauk, Raipur Town, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Civil And Revenue Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..............Defendant, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1. Smt. Janaki Bharat (Deleted) As Per The Hon'ble Court's Order Dated 06-03-2020. 2. Smt. Jayanti Bai W/o Shri Ramesh Sharma, Aged About 52 Years R/o Ramesh Garage, Tikarapara, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Jaishree Saini W/o Shri Anand Saini, Aged About 47 Years R/o Near Shweta Traders, Behind Kailash Cement, Santoshi Nagar, Tikarapara, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Reeta Bagwan W/o Krishan Kumar Bagwan, Aged About 43 Years R/o Telanpura, Akhada, In Front Of Bhalerao, Wardha Maharastra, District : Wardha, Maharashtra 5. Smt. Anita Saini W/o Shri Sanjay Saini, Aged About 41 Years R/o Kalibada In Front Of State Bank Of India, Kotma, Distt. Sahdol M.P., District : Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh 6. Smt. Arti Bhalakar W/o Shri Jagdeo Bhalakar, Aged About 39 Years R/o Budhwari Bazar, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh S.No.4 To 6 Through General Power Of Attorney Smt. Jaishree Saini W/o Shri Anand Saini, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Near Shweta Traders, Behind Kailash Cement, Santoshi Nagar, Tikarapara Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 7. Smt. Kamala Bharat W/o Late Shyam Lal Bharat, Aged About 67 Years R/o Near Chhoti Shitala Mandir, Sanjay Auto Deal, Kalibadi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.08.23 12:01:31 +0530 2 8. Sanjay Bharat S/o Late Shyamlal Bharat, Aged About 39 Years R/o Near Chhoti Shitala Mandir, Sanjay Auto Deal, Kalibadi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 9. Manoj Bharat S/o Late Shyamlal Bharat, Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Chhoti Shitala Mandir, Sanjay Auto Deal, Kalibadi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 10. Vinod Bharat S/o Late Shyamlal Bharat, Aged About 34 Years R/o Near Chhoti Shitala Mandir, Sanjay Auto Deal, Kalibadi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 11. Smt. Pushpa Sushma Bharat W/o Shri Rahul Saini, Aged About 35 Years R/o Mana Camp, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 12. Smt. Shushila W/o Late Raman Lal Barora (Died) Through Legal Heirs Nill 12(i). Prashant Barore S/o Late Raman Lal Barore Aged About 41 Years R/o C/o Sanjay Pandey, Near Chandani Chauk , Veerbhadra Nagar , Raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 12(ii). Smt. Ranjana Mali W/o Manoj Kumar Mali Aged About 37 Years R/o Katara Mohalla, Ward No. 3 Tahsil Birsinghpur, District Satna Madhya Pradesh., District : Satna, Madhya Pradesh 13. Smt. Rampyari W/o Shri Ramadhar Bharat, Aged About 82 Years R/o Through Kuldeep Saini, Aashutosh Bhavan, Ware House Road, In Front Of Dr. Anjali Gupta, Kurudand, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 14. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ...............Plaintiffs, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Manjoj Kumar Sinha, Advoctate For State : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Judgment on Board 22.08.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per the information received, the appellant has expired and no legal representative of the appellant is available to prosecute the appeal. 3 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant that no legal representative of the appellant is available to continue the appeal, the instant Second Appeal is abated on account of death of the appellant. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the legal heirs of the appellant to file application for setting aside the abatement if any grievances still survives. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish