APHC010399822022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25914/2022 Between: 1. M/S.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD., HEAD OFFICE 1'FLOOR DARE HOUSE, NO.2, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI, TAMILANADU REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. SRI. BADITHAMANI KANAKA KISHORE, ' S/O B. ESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC LAW OFFICER CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD, R/O. H.NO.10-18-2/3, PIHANIDIBBA, MAHARANI PETA, VISKAHPATRIAM- 530002, AADHAAR NO. 223492976081. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMARLAKOTTA POLICE STATION, SAMARLAKOTTA, KAKAINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. M/S SRI LAKSHMI PRASANNA TRADERS, OFF D.NO. 18/1/15, SHOP.NO.8, PEDAPURAM ROAD, SMARLAKOTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP BY ITS SMT. DESETTI LAKSHMI PRASANNA KUMARI 5. DESETTI LAKSHMI PRASANNA KUMARI, W/O. D. NOOKA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 18-3-35/3, AYODAPURAM, SMARLAKOTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. D NOOKA RAJU, S/O. D. RAMACHANDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 18-3-35/3, AYODAPURAM, SMARLAKOTA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring action of the respondent 2 and 3 in not providing police potation we cannot handing over the Property and Petitioners heavy financial losses despite my request thru Reg. Post as arbitrary, illegal, capricious, discriminate and absurd in violation of the provisions of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 350 of constitution of India, in the interest of justice forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO M R L Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring action of the respondent 2 and 3 in not providing police potation we cannot handing over the Property and Petitioners heavy financial losses despite my request thru Reg. Post as arbitrary, illegal, capricious, discriminate and absurd in violation of the provisions of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 350 of constitution of India, in the interest of justice forthwith and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioners today. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 25914 of 2022 18.11.2025 Mjl /*