Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5539 (GUJ)

HITESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI RAVIYA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/15852/2025 · 2025-08-07

Nirzar S Desai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/15852/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 15852 of 2025 ===================================================== HITESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI RAVIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ===================================================== Appearance: MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR TRUPESH KATHIRIYA ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ===================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 07/08/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent – State. 2. By this successive bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant is seeking release on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11208035250265 of 2025 dated 10.04.2025 registered with Gandhigram Police Station, District: Rajkot City for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 511 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of the applicant R/CR.MA/15852/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025 and nature of the allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions. 4. On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the respondent – State vehemently submits that, the offences, which have been charged, are serious in nature affecting the society at large and looking to the facts as well as the allegations made against the applicant, no discretion would be required to be exercised. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of the opinion that, discretion is required to be exercised to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has considered the following facts while exercising discretion in favour of the applicant :- (i) the applicant is in jail since 11.04.2025 (ii) the investigation is over and the charge- sheet is filed; (iii) it is alleged that the present applicant has through Whats App chat tried to help the main accused to change the MRI report and for that he has received Rs.5000/-; (iv) it is also submitted by learned advocate Mr. P.P. Majmudar that the present applicant is not the beneficiary of this R/CR.MA/15852/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025 scam and except for the Rs.5000/- has allegedly received for guiding the main accused about changing the MRI report, there is no other allegations against the present applicant; 6. In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11208035250265 of 2025 dated 10.04.2025 registered with Gandhigram Police Station, District: Rajkot City on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; R/CR.MA/15852/2025 ORDER DATED: 07/08/2025 [e] furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court; [f] mark his presence before the concerned police station in the first week of every month till the trial is over; 7. The Authorities will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 8. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Pallavi Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PALLAVIBEN PRABHUDAS PANCHAL(HC01403), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/08/2025 17:30:19