1 2025:CGHC:53763-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5742 of 2025 Animesh Banerjee S/o Utpal Banerjee Aged About 26 Years R/o H. No. 33, 0, Kapsi, Chhotekapsi, Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited,(Cspdcl) Through Executive Engineer (O And M), Pakhanjur Division, District Kanker (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer Cspdcl (O And M) Danganiya, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer (O And M) Cspdcl Kanker Circle, Kanker (C.G.) 4. M/s Jagdish Electricals Services Through Its Proprietor Rabi Bala R/o H. No. 67, Khilora Housing Board Colony, Old Dhamtari Road, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Vedagni Jangde, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 04/11/2025 JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.11.06 10:12:06 +0530 2 1. Heard Ms. Vedagni Jangde, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, learned counsel for respondent. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “i. That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to place all the records of the case for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. ii. That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents no. 1 to 3 and to stay the work order in favour of the respondent no. iii. That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent no 1 to 3 to open and consider the petitioners' price bid which is lowest among all the other participants. iv. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. v. Any other relief, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one and the cause title is also defective, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. 3 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court for wasting precious time fo the court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti