APHC010733012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35554/2018 Between: 1. M.RAMADEVI, W/O VENKATESWARA REDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O LIG-1-300, K.P.HOUSING BOARD, KALLURUPALLI, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY(SALT), NEW DELHI. 2. THE DEPUTY SALT COMMISSIONER, 26, HADDOWS ROAD, SHASTRI BHAVAN CHENNAI, TAMILNADU STATE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SALT, OFFICE OF THE SALT FACTORY OFFICE, MANGINAPUDI, CHILAKALAPUDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation dt.20-9-2018 along with requisite fee for renewal of lease period which is expiring on 30-9-2018 for processing of salt at 3rd respondent unit i.e. at Salt Factory, Manginapudi, Krishna district without any reason is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and to pass 2 JS, J W.P.No.35554/2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to renew the lease period from 1-10-2018 for a period of five years for processing the salt at 3rd respondent unit by considering the representation dt.20-9-2018 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.35554/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 22.11.2025 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.35554/2018 64 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35554/2018 Date: 22.11.2025 rsd