- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27732 RSA No. 130 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 130 OF 2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. HONNAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAIAH, R/AT ACHALU VILLAGE, K.P. DODDI POST, KYLANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562159. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. A.RAJESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. VENKATALAKSHAMMA W/O. KENCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D/O. LATE CHANNAIAH @ CHANNAIAH @ RAMAIAH, R/AT KADALUR VILLAGE, ATAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571428. 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. BYRAIAH @ SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O. CHANNAIAH @ CHANNAIAH @ RAMAIAH, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27732 RSA No. 130 of 2019 R/AT NAGAHALLI VILLAGE, KYLANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562159 3. SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT ACHALU VILLAGE, K.P.DODDI POST, KYLANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562159. 4. THAYI @ LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O. MALLESH, D/O. LATE VENKATESH R/AT CHAMUNDESWARI EXTENSION, RAMANAGARA TOWN, PIN CODE-570004. 5. SRI. SRINIVASA W/O. LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT ACHALU VILLAGE, K.P. DODDI POST, KYLANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562159. 6. SMT. JAYASHEELA W/O. SRI. DEVARAJ D/O. LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT CHANDAGALU VILLAGE, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571438. …RESPONDENTS (R2 AND R5 ARE SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER XLII RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.09.2018 PASSED IN RA No.76/2016 ON THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27732 RSA No. 130 of 2019 FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.8/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The learned counsel for the appellant appearing through video conferencing submitted that the parties have settled the dispute in the Lok Adalat before the Trial Court. In view of the settlement between the parties, nothing survives for consideration in this appeal. Accordingly, he prays to withdraw the appeal. 2. His submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27732 RSA No. 130 of 2019 4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn, pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration and they are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK ct: bl List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65