- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32768 WP No. 15674 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 15674 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SYED MUSTAQ AHAMED S/O SYED RASOOL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O NO.4514, SAINT MARY ROAD N.R. MOHALLA, MYSORE- 570 007 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHASILDAR CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA-577501 2. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 3. SMT. PAVITRA D/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. SMT. PAVANA D/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 5. SMT. PARINITHA D/O LATE SHANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32768 WP No. 15674 of 2025 THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5 ARE ALL R/O VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE HIREGUNTANUR HOBLI CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501 6. SRI SANNA HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS 7. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 8. KESHAVAMURTHY S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 9. SMT. ANITHA D/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 10. SRI ERAPPA S/O SANNA HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 11. SRI SHIVAMURTHY S/O SANNA HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS THE RESPONDENT NO. 6 TO 11 ARE R/O VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE HIREGUNTANUR HOBLI CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU V, HCGP FOR R1) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32768 WP No. 15674 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO.RRT.CR.262.2022-23 DATED 25-11-2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TAHASILDAR, CHITRADURGA TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE-G., ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent No.1. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons: 2. Admittedly, the names of the private respondents have been entered in the revenue records following earlier mutation orders. Therefore, it is not permissible for the petitioner to seek a direction to the Tahasildar to enter their names in the revenue records. The proper course of action for - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32768 WP No. 15674 of 2025 the petitioner is to file an appeal before the Competent Authority raising a challenge to the mutation orders passed earlier. 4. With these observations the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16