Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55361 (KAR)

THE CHIEF OFFICER v. CHANDREGOWDA

MFA/966/2022 · 2025-09-16

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36846-DB MFA No. 966 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 966 OF 2022 (LAC) BETWEEN: THE CHIEF OFFICER PANDAVAPURA PATTANA PANCHAYATH PANDAVAPURA @ TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT 571 434 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G.M ANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANDREGOWDA S/O LATE HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT HIRODEBIDI PANDAVAPURA TOWN PIN-571 434 2. THE SPECIAL AND ACQUISITON OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA, PIN- 571 434 Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36846-DB MFA No. 966 of 2022 3. THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA 571 401 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, MANDYA DIVISION BANDIGOWDA LAYOUT MANDYA-571 40 6. CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, JALA BHAVAN NO.6, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE BTM LAYOUT BANNERUGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU-560 029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R2 TO R4, SRI. C. CHANNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5, R6 - SERVED - UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36846-DB MFA No. 966 of 2022 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.11.2020 PASSED IN LAC.NO. 1/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PANDAVAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing on either side submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties. 2. The compromise petition has also been placed on record, wherein it is agreed that an amount of Rs.1,27,50,000/- will be transferred to the Bank account of respondent No.1 within a period of three months from the date of entering into this compromise petition. 3. The parties as well as the counsel have affixed their signature on the compromise petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36846-DB MFA No. 966 of 2022 4. Accepting the same, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. Parties shall abide by the terms of the same. 5. Registry shall refund the Court fee to the appellant as applicable. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2