IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 102 Malkit Singh Krishan Kumar Gill, Superintending Engineer, Ambala Circle, Public Health Engineering Department and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 herein made by the pet P-9) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled, necessary b be released within a period of three weeks thereafter.” COCP-2256-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2256 of 2025 Date of decision : Malkit Singh Versus Krishan Kumar Gill, Superintending Engineer, Ambala Circle, Public Health Engineering Department and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Aman Nain, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 08.8.2024 (Annexure P- Bench of this Court in CWP-18902-2024 others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 herein “….to consider and decide the claim made by the petitioner in representation dated 14.4.2024 (Annexure 9) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled, necessary b be released within a period of three weeks thereafter.” 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2256 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-14.05.2025 …..Petitioner Krishan Kumar Gill, Superintending Engineer, Ambala Circle, Public Health Engineering Department and another …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Aman Nain, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying -1) passed by a co-ordinate 2024 titled as “Malkit Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which direction was “….to consider and decide the claim itioner in representation dated 14.4.2024 (Annexure 9) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled, necessary benefits be released within a period of three weeks thereafter.” VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.15 19.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document from Mr. Saurabh Ahlawat, Executive Engineer, Yamuna Nagar submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking survives in the present petition. by the learned counsel for the respondent Registry to tag/paginate the same at book. does not press the present petition any further. May 14, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2256-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respondent from Mr. Saurabh Ahlawat, Executive Engineer, Yamuna Nagar submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a order dated 29.10.2024 by respondent survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated by the learned counsel for the respondent Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Mr. Saurabh Ahlawat, Executive Engineer, Yamuna Nagar submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a by respondent No.1; thus, no cause Copy of the aforesaid order dated 29.10.2024 produced by the learned counsel for the respondents-State is taken on record. appropriate place in the paper- In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.15 19.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document