Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Kerala · body
2025 DAILYLAW 5535 (KER)
CHIRACKAL KOVILAKOM DEVASWOMS v. ABDURAHIMAN PONNANKAI THAIKANDI
RP/435/2025 · 2025-04-04
Basant Balaji
Review Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5535 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5535 (KER) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 RP 435/25 2025:KER:30181 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 435 OF 2025 AGAINST OP(C) NO.546 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
CHIRACKAL KOVILAKOM DEVASWOMS, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, P.O. CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670011
BY ADVS.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN PRAVEEN K.S.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 ABDURAHIMAN PONNANKAI THAIKANDI AGED 63 YEARS, S/O MAHAMOOD, M.M.HOUSE, NEAR KUNNUMKAI COLONY, CHIRACKAL P.O., KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR, PIN - 670011
2 MUNEER P.T.,S/O MAHAMOOD M.M., PT HOUSE, KANHIRATHARA, P.O.CHIRACKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670011
3 ALINKEEL THANKAM ALIAS A.K. THANKAM ALIAS THANKAM KUMARAN, AGED 72 YEARS, W/O PALLIYATH KUMARAN, VIMA, PUTHIYATHERU, P.O.CHIRACKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670011
4 M.M.MAHAMOOD,AGED 85 YEARS, S/O MOIDEENKUTTY, KADEEJA MANZIL, KANHIRATHARA, P.O.CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670011
5 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR & COMPETENT AUTHORITY (LA), NH UNIT NO.2, KANNUR, PIN - 670001
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. PARTHASARATHY, GP SRI. S. UNNIKRISHNAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2 RP 435/25 2025:KER:30181 O R D E R (Dated this the 4th day of April 2025) The review petitioner is a third party to the Original Petition. Leave was granted as per order dated 25.3.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2025. The R.P. is filed on the ground that the review petitioners were not made parties to the Original Petition. Though they were claimants before the competent authority, but not made as parties in the L.A.R. before the District court.
2. The grievance highlighted is that they are now excluded from participating in the land acquisition proceedings and because of the direction issued by this court in the O.P., the District Corut is proceeding without impleading them.
On going through the averments as well as the submission made, I am satisfied that there is an error apparent on the face of the record and accordingly, this R.P. is allowed.
Sd/- BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE dl/
3 RP 435/25 2025:KER:30181 APPENDIX OF RP 435/2025
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 03-03-2025 IN OP© NO.546 OF 2025 OF THIS HONBLE COURT
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08-06-2023 IN W.P.(C) NO.1624 OF 2023 OF THIS HONBLE COURT
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE IMPLEADING PETITION IA NO.3/2025 DATED 03-03-2025 IN LAR(NHA) NO.10/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN