Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55343 (PNJ)

LOPAMUDRA DAS AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4711/2025 · 2025-05-08

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Lopamudra Das State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfe No.4 & 5 and their relatives. 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 certificate evidencing their marriage The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 0 P-5) to respondent n 3. 4. of the respondent 5. value of the documents placed 4711-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Lopamudra Das and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents and their relatives. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 & 5 certificate evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexure The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 0 5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4711-2025 Decided on:08.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the re in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 & 5. They & 5. Their photographs and marriage on record as Annexures P-3 and P The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 06.05.2025 (Annexure Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary on the file, I dispose of the petition with a ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the re in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They marriage P-4. .05.2025 (Annexure , accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary on the file, I dispose of the petition with a VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.09 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-47 direction to respondent no.2 Fatehgarh Sahib and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. May 08, 2025 vinod* 4711-2025 direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fatehgarh Sahib to decide the representation (Annexure P and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion er by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. May 08, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Superintendent of Police, District to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion er by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Superintendent of Police, District ) of the petitioners It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.09 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document