Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5534 (HP)

BALKRISHAN v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/571/2025 · 2025-03-20

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bal Kirshan Vs. State of HP Cr. MP(M) No.571 of 2025 20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate vice Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial & Mr.Sushant Kaprate, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Cr.MP(M) No.571 of 2024 Notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. By medium of this application, the appellant-applicant has sought condonation of delay of 42 days that has crept up in filing of the main appeal. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail, we deem it appropriate to condone the aforesaid delay. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No. 2025 (CRAST No.331/ 25) Be registered. Admit. Call for the records. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) March 20, 2025 Judge (VH)