BACHU AMARNATH v. DISTRIT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION II
WP/30752/2025 · 2025-11-05
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010581602025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 30752 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-16 [3446] Bachu Amarnath ...Petitioner Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission - II and others
...Respondents
********** Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Sathi Sneha Latha Advocate for Respondents : GP for Civil Supplies
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 6th November, 2025 P C :
Considering the fact that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, we do not see any reason to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Vjl