APHC010170052018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.7491 OF 2018 Between: Nayudu Venkateswara Rao, S/o Nayudu Maddi Ramaiah, Aged about 62 years, R/o Near Kanyakaparameswari Temple, Taduvai village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari district. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Thullulru Mandal Amaravathi, Guntur District, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.V.Ganesh Bhujanga Rao Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Assignment G.P. for Social Welfare The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “ … … declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in issuing the Pattadar pass books, Title deeds and also D-Form Patta in favour of third parties who are not the beneficiaries of the Bhoodhan Gramdhan Act and also violated Under Section 14(1) of Act, 13 of the Bhoodhan, Gramdhan Act is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 to sanction the benefits issued by the 6th respondents in favour of the 2 petitioner while treating him as legitimate beneficiary of the originally allotted land to an extent of Ac.0.95 in Sy.No.99/7 situated at Taduwai Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, West Godavari District. …” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner while furnishing the copies of the orders in Writ Petition No.33980 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.34076 of 2018, dated 20.9.2018, states that the present writ petition can as well be disposed of, by passing similar order. 3. Mr.K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader, however, placed a copy of the written instructions dated 18.11.2025 received from the respondent No.4 for perusal of this Court, wherein it is, inter alia stated that the writ petitioner filed Writ Petition No.11406 of 2025 seeking a direction to the respondents therein to conduct enquiry and restore the subject land to the petitioner. A copy of the Pattadar Adangal dated 18.11.2025 is enclosed to the said instructions, in respect of the subject land, wherein the name of one Sripada Naresh is reflected in the column of pattadar and enjoyer. It would also appear that the petitioner earlier filed Writ Petition No.1526 of 2021, aggrieved by the inaction of the official respondents therein in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 04.11.2020 submitted for restoration of the land, by evicting the respondent Nos.5 to 9 as contemplated under the provisions of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, and the same was disposed of, by an order dated 21.1.2021. Be that as it may. 4. In the written instructions, it is also stated that there is no proposal to acquire the subject land under R&R Scheme. 5. In view of the order in Writ Petition No.1526 of 2021 and as the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.11406 of 2025, this Court deems it not necessary to further examine the present writ petition and, accordingly, 3 the same is closed. The closure of the writ petition, however, would not preclude the writ petitioner to raise all the contentions/issues in the pending Writ Petition No.11406 of 2025. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J November 24, 2025 vasu