CR-2821-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (131) CR-2821-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: - 08.05.2025 Deepak Verma ....Petitioner Versus Rajiv Mehta .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Vinay Kumar Begra, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 11.04.2025 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, vide which the petition filed by the respondent-landlord under Section 13-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for ejectment of the petitioner-tenant, has been allowed and the petitioner was directed to hand over the possession of the demised premises within a period of one month from the date of passing of the said order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner during the course of arguments, has submitted that the petitioner would withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the petitioner is a tenant in the premises for the last more than 5 years. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.08 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-2821-2025 (O&M) -2- petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the following observations/directions:- (i) The petitioner would be permitted to occupy the premises till 08.08.2025, subject to the conditions mentioned hereinafter and would vacate the premises and hand over the keys of the premises to the respondent on or before 08.08.2025. (ii) The petitioner would pay an amount of Rs.15,000/- per month from the month of May, 2025 up to the period the petitioner stays in occupation, on or before 22nd of every month. (iii) The petitioner would pay the arrears of rent, if any, within a period of one month from today. (iv) The petitioner would file an undertaking on the said three aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not submit the said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the landlord to seek immediate possession of the premises in question from the petitioner by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of Courts Act. 5. In view of what has been observed above, the present revision petition is disposed of. ( VIKAS BAHL ) May 08, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.08 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement