Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5533 (CHH)

MEETLAL KAUSHIK v. RAVI KUMAR

MCC/59/2022 · 2025-01-10

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:1665 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 59 of 202 2 • Meetlal Kaushik S/o Gokran Prasad Kaushik Aged About 50 Years Mazdoor R/o Dhandhan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant Versus 1. Ravi Kumar S/o Gokran Prasad, Agriculturist R/o Dhandhan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2. Durga Prasad S/o Gokran Prasad Aged About 42 Years R/o Dhandhan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. Brij Mohan Kaushik, S/o Ravi Kumar Kaushik Aged About 20 Years R/o Dhandhan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4. Jagmohan Kaushik, S/o Ravi Kumar Aged About 11 Years Since Minor Through Father And Natural Guardian Ravi Kumar S/o Gokran Prasad, 5. State of M.P. (Now State of C.G.) Through Collector, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Applicant : Ms. Harshika Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 5 : : Ms. Sakshi Chhabda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate Ms. Mandvi Bharadwaj, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu ORDER ON BOARD 10/01 / 2025 1. This application is filed seeking restoration of F.A. No. 32/2004 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 18.01.2019. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for applicant is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 3. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and the pleadings made in the application for restoration of F.A. No. 32/2004, it is allowed. 4. It is directed that F.A. No. 32/2004 be restored to its original number. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn