1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 6 of 2017 Lal Mahendra Singh Tekam S/o Lal Bahadur Singh Aged About 49 Years R/o Rajabada, Doundilohara, Tahsil And Police Station- Doundilohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Motilal S/o Khetmal Sancheti Aged About 36 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Tarachand S/o Phosalal Jain Aged About 39 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 3 - Komalchand S/o Rajmal Jain Aged About 41 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 4 - Yatendra S/o Phoolsingh Dewangan Aged About 38 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 5 - Bhanwarlal S/o Manaklal Jain Aged About 45 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 6 - Rajendra Kumar S/o Gendmal Jain Aged About 28 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 7 - Goukaran Sinha S/o Phusuram Sinha Aged About 40 Years R/o Doundilohara, District Durg, Present District Balod, Chhattisgarh., 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondent 1 : Shri Aditya Shrivastava appears on behalf of Shri B.P.Singh, Advocate. For Respondents No.2, 3, 4 & 7. : Shri P.R. Patankar, Advocate. For Respondent 8/State : Shri Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.08.21 17:41:36 +0530 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order Sheet 21/08/2025 1. Since none was present on behalf of appellant nor any representation is made for the appellant even after repeated calls, therefore, in absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, no other option is left out to this Court but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani