1 APHC010328342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16674/2024 Between: 1. G V V RAMAMOHAN RAO, S/O LATE NAGA HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1/87, MUNJULURU VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. G.B.V. NAGA RAKESH,, S/O G.V.V. RAMAMOHAN RAO, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1/87, MUNJULURU VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IBRAHIMPATNAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, IBRAHIMPATNAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 7. ATHMURI VENKATESH, S/O NNCHARAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS. OLD RESIDING AT MUNJULURU VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY R/O PAYAKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK AFZAL MOHAMMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “..to issue an order, direction or Writ more and particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondents no. 5 and 6 in interfering with money transactions between the petitioners and respondent no. 7 and seizing the Tata Indica car bearing no. AP16DN2597 belonging to petitioners no. 1 and 2 and keeping the car in police station and calling the petitioners no. 1 and 2 to the police station and trying to settle the money disputes between the petitioners and respondent no. 7 same is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and consequently a) direct the respondents no. 5 and 6 not to interfere with money transactions between the petitioners and respondent no. 7 and b) direct the respondents no. 5 and 6 to handover the Tata Indica car bearing no. AP16DN2597 to the petitioners no. 1 and 2...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 30.12.2025 ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16674 of 2024 Dt..30.12.2025 ASR