IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26817 OF 2003 ■v. ’. V ■n> ^ \ '»/ d Between: B.Mallikarjuna, S/o. Jayaram, Aged about 28 years, Occ; Contract Labour O/o D.E.Operation, Adoni, KurnoolDistrict. 1 ...PETITIONER 'and 1. The Managing Director, A.P. Transco, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Engineer (Operation), A.P.Transco Cuddapah. , y 3. The Superintending Engineer (Operation), A.P.Transco, Kurnool Circle, Kurnool. 4. The Divisional ElectricaL Engineer (Operation) Kurnool. Cuddapah Zone, j A.P.Transco, Adoni j 7 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writbrder or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the one respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Junior Lineman, even though the rejection of the petitioner's case for absorption on the ground that the petitioners supplied by an unlicenced contractor was struck down by this Hon'ble High Court in W.A.No.449/99 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 16, 19 are • and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the suitable post forthwith as per Memo dt. 10-05-1999. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP. NP: 339^40 OF 20031 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption and appointment in terms of judgment in W.A.No.449/99, dt.23-04-1999 and Memo dt. 10-05-1999. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P VADDI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA (SC FOR APSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010597642003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY .THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26817/2003 \ Between: B.mallikarjuna, Kurnool Dist., ...PETITIONER AND Managing Director Hyd 3 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.P VADDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2.. The Court made the following: ORDER: On 28.03.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 2. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1 e //TRUE COPY// SECTI C<^/^FICER To. 1. One CC to Sri P Vaddi Advocate [OPUC] fORjq *° sc for APSPDCL, Advocate 3. Three CD Copies TF (gsg) / high court DATED;01/05/2025 ORDER W/P.No.26817 of 2003 a 0 5 AUG 2025 SuTcoSir-’’- "o"-PROSECUTION,