Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:1204
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 722 of 2017 1 - Kuldeep Kujur S/o Late Markus Kujur, Aged About 46 Years Posted As Senior Scientific Officer, Biology, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dr. Smt. Shesha Saxena, W/o Alok Mohan Saxena, Aged About 63 Years Retired Joint Director, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, R/o Awanti Vihar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----- Respondent(s) WPS No. 729 of 2017 1 - Smt. Anupama Meshram W/o Satish Meshram, Aged About 44 Years Posted As Senior Scientific Officer Serology, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
---Petitioner(s) Versus SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2025.01.09 10:35:00 +0530
2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Dr. Smt. Shesha Saxena W/o Alok Mohan Saxena Aged About 63 Years Retired Joint Director, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur R/o. Awanti Vihar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents _____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners :Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate appears along with Shri Aman Tamrakar, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1&2 :Shri Ratan Pusty, Government Advocate For Respondent No.3 :Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J
Order On Board 08.01.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that these petitions have becomes infructuous.
2. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Sanjay S. Agrawal)
JUDGE sunita