APHC010026602021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1871/2021 Between: 1. AMBUJALAPU VARAHALUBABU, S/O PEDA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 1-1, BUCHIRAJUPETA VILLAGE, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THONDANGI POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. N AMEER VIDYASAGAR, S/O LAXMINARAYANA AGED 48 YEARS, GANDHINAGAR, PALAPARTHIVARI VEEDHI, KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of wirt of mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police Station at the behest of 4th respondent and threatening to handover his Zeroyatiland admeasuring Ac. -0.30 cents in Sy. Nio. 750 situated at A. V. Nagar, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District without any authority or jurisdiction and thereby causing interference in the civil matters, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, 2 unconstitutional and violative of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent here to take action against the 3rd respondent for interfering in the civil disputes, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard Smt S.V.Indira, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. In the event of any crime registered against the petitioner, the police are directed to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1871 of 2021 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr