APHC010357712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22857/2021 Between: GOLAMARI KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O. PEDDA CHANDRA REDDY AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. MEERAJAPETA VILLAGE, TARLAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARKAPUR CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARKAPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. RACHAMADUGU VENKATA SUBBA RAMESH BABU, S/O. BALA RATNAM SETTY, R/O D.NO.9/147, KASTURIBAI STREET, MARKAPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. BODANAPU INDRASINI HIMA BINDU REDDY, D/O LATE SUBBA REDDY, R/O. NEAR JANAKE CHENNA REDDY HOUSE VEMULAKOTA VILLAGE AND POST MARKAPURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V.N.V.SURYA DATTU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI 3. SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus aggrieved by the action of respondents, particularly the respondent at the instance of respondents 5 and 6 in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent police station and insisting him to vacate and deliver the Land of Ac. 3.36 Cents covered by Sy. No. 3/2, of Narasimhapuram Village in Markapuram Mandal of Prakasam District to 5th and 6th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's possession over the said lands and his personal liberty.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.5 and 6. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.5 and 6. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22857 of 2021 Dt.15.10.2025 Dinesh