IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11696 OF 2025 Between: Patakamsetti Sankar, R/o 4-89/1, Rajucheeruvui, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner/Accused No.4 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, through Station House Officer, Maharanipeta P.S Visakhapatnam Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of at Amaravathi ...Respondent Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner/Accused No. 4 on bail in connection with Crime No.107of 2025 of Maharanipeta P.S, Visakhapatnam. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ramineni Sudheer, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following APHC010605502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11696/2025 Between: PATAKAMSETTI SANKAR, R/0 4-89/1, RAJUCHEERUVUI, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: RAMINENI SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail in Crime No. 107 of 2025 of Maharanipeta Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.4 herein for the offences punishable under 2 Dr.YLR,J Crl.PNo.11696 of 2025 Dated 05.12.2025 Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. As seen from the record, the alleged recovery took place in the city of Visakhapatnam,where a sufficient number of Gazetted Officers are available. 3. The alleged time of the offence is 30.07.2025 at 12:00 noon, i.e., in broad daylight. There is no explanation in the mediators’ report as to why the search or the preparation of the mediators’ report was not conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. There is no dearth of Gazetted Officers in Visakhapatnam District. The averments in the mediators’ report consist entirely of confessional statements made by the accused before police officers, which are hit by Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. 4. In this context, it is apposite to refer the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in P. Krishna Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh\ at Para No.53 (iv) it is held as under: From the above exposition of law, the following emerges: (iv) Where such police statement of an accused is confessional statement, the rigour of Section(s) 25 and 26 respectively will apply with all its vigour. A confessional statement of an accused will only be admissible if it is not hit by Section(s) 24 or 25 respectively and is in tune with the provisions of Section(s) 26, 28 and 29 of the Evidence Act respectively. In other words, a police statement of an accused which is in the form of a confession is per se inadmissible and no reliance whatsoever can be placed on such statements either at the stage of bail or during trial. Since such confessional statements are rendered inadrhissible by virtue of Section 25 of the Evidence Act, the provision of Section 53. 2025 see Online SC 1157 3 Dr. YLR,J Crl..PNo.11696of2025 Dated 05.12.2025 30 would be of no avail, and no reliance can be placed on such confessional statement of an accused to implicate another co accused. The alleged mediators are ward women police personnel, who belong to the Police Department. The search was not conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. There is a reference in the mediators’ report that the accused informed the police that they need not be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer, and to that extent, consent was obtained by the police from the accused. Indeed, 1.5 kg of liquid ganja was found in the possession of Accused No.3, but not in the possession of the Petitioner/Accused No.4. Except for the confession of the co-accused, no substantial material is 5. available. So far, five witnesses have been examined. They are all material and official witnesses. A substantial portion of the investigation is completed with regard to the alleged role played by the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested and remanded on 31.07.2025. He has been 6. in judicial custody for the past 127 days. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Pedurthi, Visakhapatnam. He has got fixed abode. If he is enlarged on bail, he may not evade the process of law. There are no adverse or similar criminal antecedents reported against the petitioner. No application was filed seeking custodial interrogation of the petitioner. The period of custodial interrogation has also been completed. .4 Dr.YLR.J Crl..PNo.11696 of 2025 Dated 05.12.2025 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and 7. gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused No.4, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent 8. conditions; i. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall be enlarged on bail subject to him executing bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. ii. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet. iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. V. The Petitioner/AccusedNo.4 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case 5 Dr. YLR,J Crl.PNo.11696 of 2025 Dated 05.12.2025 and shall make himself available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required, vi. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. SD/-U.SR! DEVI deputyr^strar nlo^FFICER //TRUE COPY// see To 1. The II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. 2. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Special Judge for trail of offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Station House Officer, Maharanipeta Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 5. One CC to Sri Ramineni Sudheer, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P., Amaravati.[OUT] 7. One spare copy. PSD HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATE:05/12/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.11696 of 2025 ALLOWED ?