APHC010277552022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17184/2022 Between: 1. MACHA ASHOK,, S/O M.JOHN PAULSON, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO H.NO.3-19B, FLAT NO.401, APPLE RESIDENCY, SSS COLONY, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDA KAKANI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK SULEMAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.61-8/5-1, GEETHA NAGAR, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. MUSHRATH UNNISA, W/O SHAIK SULEMAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE IN ICICI BANK, R/O H.NO. 61-8/5-1, 2 GEETHA NAGAR, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in interfering into the civil disputes and threatening the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent NO.6 and 7 and threatening to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent NO.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and creating panic situation by making the calls and used to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and creating panic situations, is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes, not to threaten the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 and threatening to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and creating panic situation by making the calls and used to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and creating panic situations, is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes, not to threaten the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 and not threaten to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7, not to creating panic situation by making the calls and not to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes, not to threaten the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 and not threaten to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without 3 providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7, not to creating panic situation by making the calls and not to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17184 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in interfering into the civil disputes and threatening the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6 and 7 and threatening to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent No.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and creating panic situation by making the calls and used to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and creating panic situations, is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes, not to threaten the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 and threatening to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7 and creating panic situation by making the calls and used to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and creating panic situations, is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes, not to threaten the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 and not threaten to do work of interior designing in house of the respondent Nos.6 and 7 without paying the amounts and without providing the materials, by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 and 7, not to creating panic situation by making the calls and not to send the police constables to the house of the petitioner and pass..…” 5 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the Respondent-Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.11.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17184 of 2022 Dated.22.11.2025 UPS 204