Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80523-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15237 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gyan Prakash Shrivastava Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. In the present case, the contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that he has regularized the account by paying the amount to the bank is seriously disputed by the bank and the bank submits that since the action has been taken by them under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), this Court should not intervene. It is further noted that against the notice Section 13(4) of the Act the petitioner has already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal. 3. In light of the same, we do not see any reason to intervene at this stage. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad