Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CR-2818-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 SHYAM SINGH ... Petitioner V/S SURINDER SINGH ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. After addressing for sometime, Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, counsel for the petitioner states that first appeal preferred against the
judgment and decree dated 21.09.2024, Annexure P-5, is pending before District Court at Karnal and is posted for hearing on 21.07.2025. He submits that as the right of the petitioner to use the tubewell has been adversely affected by virtue of the impugned order, Annexure P-9, First Appellate Court be directed to decide the appeal expeditiously in a time bound manner.
2. Having considered the nature of the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not deem it necessary to call upon the respondent. Concededly, first appeal is pending and is listed for
arguments. Learned District Judge, Karnal is requested to expedite the hearing of the appeal and decide it preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of copy of this order.
3. Revision petition is disposed of. 08.07.2025
(SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.07.10 15:08 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment