Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5525 (RAJ)

SU SON OF PRADEEP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/258/2025 · 2025-03-20

Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12663-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 258/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.8/2025 Su Son Of Pradeep, Aged About 16 Years, Resident Of Moroli Dang, Rudawal, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Observation Home Bharatpur) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. with Ms. Chanchal, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Mavaliya, Adv. and Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl. G.A with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A Mr. Tara Chand Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/03/2025 1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial. In support of his contentions, he has filed certificate under Rule 311(3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules. He further submits that accused-applicant was juvenile at the time of incident. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits [2025:RJ-JP:12663-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-258/2025] that no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-appli- cant. He is in judicial custody since 20.12.2024. Hearing of the appeal may take long time. So, the sentence awarded to the accused-applicant be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate as well as counsel for the complainant have opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 4. We have considered the contentions. 5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-appli- cant by the trial court vide judgment dated 20.12.2024 in Sessions case No.65/2020 (71/2020) shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal and he be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 21.04.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court immediately through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH/Ritu/20